The Spectral Canvas of Impunity: "Nanlaban," Philippine Art, and the Esoteric Dialectics of Visibility and Erasure
The Spectral Canvas of Impunity: "Nanlaban," Philippine Art, and the Esoteric Dialectics of Visibility and Erasure
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
May 26, 2026
The "Nanlaban" Narrative and the Specter of Selective Sovereignty: A Philosophical Summation on Power, Narrative, and Impunity
In the shadowed annals of Philippine jurisprudence and political ontology, Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen's separate concurring opinion in the matter involving Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa stands as a piercing indictment—not merely of a singular figure, but of an entire epistemological regime that sustained one of the republic's darker episodes. The “nanlaban” narrative, that terse vernacular incantation (“he fought back”), functioned as a lethal semiotic shield during the Duterte-era war on drugs. It transformed extrajudicial executions into purported acts of self-defense by state agents, often in warrantless operations targeting the poor, the defenseless, and the nameless. Estimates of deaths ranged from official figures around 6,000 to independent tallies exceeding 30,000. Leonen's observation that this narrative "did not happen" to dela Rosa—former PNP chief and architect of Project Double Barrel—exposes a profound philosophical rupture: the asymmetry between the sovereign's enforcers and the sovereign's subjects.
The Ontology of "Nanlaban": Biopolitics and the State of Exception
Philosophically, the “nanlaban” construct evokes Giorgio Agamben's *homo sacer* and the state of exception. In Agambenian terms, the drug war instantiated a zone where certain lives—primarily those of the urban poor suspected of *shabu* involvement—were reduced to bare life (*zoē*), stripped of juridical protections and exposed to sovereign violence without recourse to due process. The narrative provided a post-hoc legal fiction: resistance justified lethal force. This was not mere operational shorthand but a biopolitical technology, Foucaultian in its disciplinary and thanatopolitical dimensions. It produced knowledge (the "fact" of resistance) that justified power, while erasing counter-narratives through the finality of death. Thousands were silenced, their bodies reduced to statistics or planted evidence, their deaths ontologically reframed as self-inflicted consequences of moral failing.
Yet, as Leonen underscores, this narrative collapsed in its application to dela Rosa himself. When confronted with an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for alleged crimes against humanity—stemming from his role in a "common plan" to neutralize suspected criminals—dela Rosa did not "resist." He sought sanctuary within the Senate, leveraged institutional privilege, and evaded custody, rendering him at large as of mid-2026. This evasion, facilitated by protective custody rather than confrontation, inverts the logic imposed on the powerless. Where the subaltern "fought back" and died, the architect of the apparatus fled and lived. Here lies the esoteric core: sovereignty is not neutral but stratified. It grants exceptions to its own guardians while denying them to the governed.
Narrative as Power: Arendt, Foucault, and the Banality of Institutional Evasion
Hannah Arendt's analysis of the banality of evil finds resonance not only in the mid-level enforcers who internalized the kill quotas and “nanlaban” script, but in the higher echelons where policy meets impunity. The drug war was no aberration of rogue elements alone; it was enabled by a confluence of populist mandate, weakened institutions, and a cultural tolerance for authoritarian expediency. Leonen's concurrence recalls this as a “darker episode,” invoking collective memory against forgetting. Yet the philosophical tragedy deepens in the selective application of accountability. Dela Rosa's flight—enabled by legislative sanctuary—illustrates what Jacques Derrida termed the "mystical foundation of authority": law's origin in violence, sustained by its selective suspension.
In Foucauldian terms, the “nanlaban” discourse was a regime of truth production. It disciplined public perception, framing state violence as necessary defense against existential threats (the “drug menace”). When the ICC intervenes—representing a supranational normative order—the response reveals the limits of domestic sovereignty. Dela Rosa's insistence on Philippine courts alone echoes Carl Schmitt's decisionist sovereign (“he who decides on the exception”), yet the Supreme Court's denial of his Temporary Restraining Order (in a 9-5-1 vote) signals a partial reassertion of constitutional bounds, even as political realities allow continued evasion.
This disparity raises profound questions of justice as fairness (Rawls) and recognition (Honneth). The poor who died under "nanlaban" were denied recognition as full moral agents; their deaths required no rigorous evidentiary hearing. The powerful, by contrast, access layers of procedural protection, institutional shelter, and narrative reframing (“political persecution”). Esoterically, this suggests a hidden metaphysics of Philippine power: a hybrid of patronage democracy and machismo sovereignty, where accountability is performative for the masses but elastic for elites.
Summative Philosophical Conclusion: Toward a Hermeneutics of Restitution
The case of Senator dela Rosa vis-à-vis the absent “nanlaban” denouement does not merely highlight hypocrisy; it unveils the fragility of the rule of law when confronted with its own architects. In an in-depth philosophical register, the drug war and its aftermath compel a hermeneutics of suspicion toward state narratives. Truth emerges not from official pronouncements but from the interstices: the bodies uncounted, the witnesses silenced, the fugitives sheltered.
Ultimately, Leonen's intervention gestures toward an ethical imperative: the reconstruction of a just polity demands confronting the *aporia* of selective exception. A society that rationalizes mass death through linguistic fiat while shielding its perpetrators through institutional maneuver cannot claim moral coherence. Restitution requires not vengeance, but rigorous truth-seeking—international and domestic—paired with a renewed commitment to the dignity of bare life. Only then can the darker episode transition from cyclical impunity to a dialectical unfolding toward genuine justice: where no one, architect or victim, is reduced to disposable narrative, and sovereignty submits to the higher universality of human rights.
The “nanlaban” that never was for Bato dela Rosa thus becomes the spectral indictment that always was—for the republic's soul. In evading the bullet of resistance, he confronts the heavier burden of historical judgment.
The Spectral Canvas of Impunity: "Nanlaban," Philippine Art, and the Esoteric Dialectics of Visibility and Erasure
In the chiaroscuro of Philippine contemporary history, Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen's observation—that the “nanlaban” narrative did not befall Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa—unfurls as a profound ontological rupture. Where the drug war's victims, largely the urban poor, were narratively consigned to resistance and death under warrantless operations, the former PNP chief sought institutional sanctuary, evading the ICC arrest warrant for his alleged role in crimes against humanity. This asymmetry is not mere political contingency but a metaphysical indictment of stratified sovereignty. Philippine art, particularly in its social realist and protest traditions, serves as the critical nexus: a counter-epistemology that renders visible the erased bodies, disrupts official scripts, and probes the esoteric undercurrents of power, trauma, and moral evasion.
Biopolitics of the Brush: From Martial Law to the Drug War's Thanatopolitics
Philippine art has long functioned as a hermeneutic of suspicion against state violence. The social realism movement of the 1970s, crystallized by the Kaisahan group (founded 1975-1976), emerged under Marcos' martial law as a direct response to authoritarian repression, feudalism, and imperialism. Artists like Pablo Baens Santos, Antipas Delotavo, and Edgar Talusan Fernandez deployed stark, allegorical imagery—distorted bodies, bloodied flags, clenched fists—to expose the *homo sacer* status of the oppressed. Their manifesto emphasized art for the masses, reflection theory, and social transformation, mirroring Agamben's state of exception and Foucault's biopolitics.
The Duterte-era drug war (2016 onward) recapitulates this history with eerie precision. “Nanlaban”—a linguistic sleight conjuring self-defense amid thousands of extrajudicial killings—echoes Marcos-era justifications. Contemporary artists, through collectives like **RESBAK** (Respond and Break the Silence Against the Killings), reclaim the aesthetic as resistance. RESBAK's interdisciplinary works—zines, performances, murals, and installations—humanize the “nameless ones,” countering the drug war's thanatopolitical machinery that reduces lives to disposable statistics.
Carlo Gabuco's installation *Those Without Names* (or *Everyday Impunity*) exemplifies this. Walls saturated with photographs of killings, mourning families, and bloodied streets force a visceral encounter with bare life. By incorporating relics like the actual chair where a victim died, Gabuco collapses representation into presence, compelling viewers to confront the reality Leonen alludes to: a darker episode where narrative fiat legitimized mass death. Raffy Lerma's iconic photographs, such as the image of a grieving partner cradling a slain loved one, similarly function as *punctum* (Barthes)—piercing the banal acceptance of violence and exposing the predatory shadow of state power.
Esoteric Dimensions: Myth, Allegory, and the Archetype of Evasion
Esoterically, Philippine art draws on indigenous and postcolonial symbology to deepen the critique. The drug war's “nanlaban” script parallels mythic *aswang*—shape-shifting predators preying on the vulnerable—recast here as institutional machismo. Artists like Archie Oclos, with *Ang Mamatay nang Dahil sa Iyo* (displayed at the Cultural Center of the Philippines), drape the Philippine map in funereal imagery, evoking a nation devouring its children. This alchemical transmutation of grief into protest reveals a hidden metaphysics: power's elasticity for the elite (dela Rosa's Senate sanctuary and flight) versus its rigidity for the subaltern.
Philosophically, this nexus invokes Walter Benjamin's “angel of history,” where progress piles wreckage at the feet of the observer. Dela Rosa's evasion—enabled by protective custody amid an unsealed ICC warrant—mirrors the selective visibility in art. While victims' bodies were photographed in death to justify operations, the powerful remain spectral, at large. Rancière's “distribution of the sensible” is inverted: the state determines who is grievable, but art redistributes by making the erased sensible, audible, and ethically demanding.
Performance works, such as JK Anicoche's collaborations with drug war widows reappropriating Zumba (a tool once used in humiliating "rehabilitation"), add a corporeal layer. The body, once policed and eliminated, dances as testimony—embodying Derrida's hauntology, where the specters of the killed refuse erasure.
Critical Synthesis: Art as Aporia and Imperative
The philosophical depth lies in art's role as both witness and wound. Leonen's concurrence recalls the drug war's darkness; Philippine art does not merely illustrate but ontologically challenges it. Social realism's legacy—from Kaisahan to RESBAK—exposes the banality of evil (Arendt) in policy implementation and the mystical foundation of authority (Derrida) in its selective suspension. Dela Rosa's “non-combatant” flight underscores the hypocrisy: the narrative weaponized against the poor dissolves for its architects, revealing sovereignty as patronage rather than universal law.
Yet art offers no easy redemption. It dwells in *aporia*—the impossibility of full restitution amid ongoing impunity. Installations demand ethical spectatorship; murals demand collective memory. In a Heideggerian sense, art unconceals (*aletheia*) the forgetfulness that allows darker episodes to recur, from martial law's disappeared to the drug war's unnamed.
Summative Esoteric Conclusion: Toward an Aesthetic of Restitution
The “nanlaban” that spared Bato dela Rosa while claiming thousands finds its true counter in Philippine art's esoteric insistence on the dignity of bare life. Through bloodied canvases, photographic archives, and performative reclamations, artists enact a dialectical negation: exposing stratified exceptions while forging a universal ethics of recognition. This is no mere aestheticization of politics but a politics of the aesthetic that troubles the soul of the republic.
In the end, the spectral canvas indicts and redeems. As dela Rosa remains at large, the artworks stand as eternal warrants—demanding not vengeance, but a hermeneutics of truth where no life is narratively disposable, and sovereignty yields to the higher universality of justice and human flourishing. Philippine art thus becomes the republic's conscience: a philosophical mirror reflecting both its abyss and its unrealized light. Only through such unflinching vision can the darker episode yield to dialectical becoming. **Title: "Nanlaban's Absent Shadow: Philippine Art as Spectral Warrant Against Stratified Impunity"**
Curatorial Frame
As a practicing artist, curator, and cultural worker who has spent decades navigating the fraught intersections of aesthetics and activism in the Philippines, I approach this exhibition frame not as detached scholarship but as a lived intervention. Imagine, if you will, a gallery space where the air hangs heavy with the faint metallic scent of imagined blood and the distant echo of a Zumba beat turned requiem. Here, in the dim light, Leonen's words flicker like a half-forgotten slide projection: the “nanlaban” narrative—that vernacular talisman of justified lethality—did not claim Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa. Instead, the former PNP chief, architect of the drug war's operational machinery, slipped into the Senate's protective custody, evading the ICC's arrest warrant like a character in a particularly ironic telenovela.
This curatorial endeavor, tentatively housed in the imagined halls of a resistant cultural institution (perhaps a reimagined CCP or a pop-up in the ruins of a Payatas community center), gathers works that refuse the erasure. It is academic in its rigor, humane in its centering of the grieving mother cradling her slain partner (Raffy Lerma's *Pietà*-like photograph, evoking Michelangelo while indicting the state), esoteric in its invocation of *aswang* mythologies refigured as institutional predators, humorous in its dark irony (one can almost hear the gallery guard quip, “He didn't fight back? How convenient”), poignant in its mourning, erudite in its philosophical scaffolding, critical in its disavowal of power's alibis, and anecdotal in its grounding in the stories of widows forced into performative rehabilitation dances.
Philippine art has always been a battleground of visibility. From the Kaisahan collective's 1976 manifesto—born amid Marcos-era martial law, with Pablo Baens Santos, Antipas Delotavo, and Edgar Talusan Fernandez wielding brushes like bolos against feudalism and imperialism—to the RESBAK collective's urgent zines and performances under Duterte, art functions as counter-narrative. It disrupts the biopolitical script where the poor become *homo sacer*, bare life extinguished under the post-hoc justification of “nanlaban.” Leonen's separate concurring opinion frames the drug war as one of the republic's “darker episodes,” a thanatopolitical theater where warrantless operations produced corpses reframed as aggressors.
Consider Carlo Gabuco's installations, such as those in *Everyday Impunity* or *Those Without Names*. A bloodstained couch from a Payatas crime scene sits amid walls of photographs—raw, unflinching documents of bodies splayed like discarded marionettes. As curator, I would position this beside a performative piece by JK Anicoche, where drug war widows reclaim Zumba not as humiliating state "rehab" but as defiant choreography of survival. The humor? The bitter laugh when one realizes the architect of the kill quotas now dances with institutional immunity, while the subaltern danced to avoid bullets.
Esoterically, this frame draws on Walter Benjamin's angel of history, wings caught in the storm of progress, gazing at the wreckage. Dela Rosa's evasion—Senate sanctuary leading to continued absence—reveals sovereignty's esoteric stratification: elastic for the powerful, fatal for the nameless. Philippine social realism, with its distorted figures and clenched fists, has long allegorized this. Archie Oclos's funeral maps draped in blood evoke a nation consuming its children, an *ghost* in bureaucratic guise.
Anecdotally, I recall curating a small RESBAK-affiliated show in 2018 where a grieving mother touched Lerma's print and whispered, “That could have been my son.” The work's *punctum* (Barthes) pierced the official statistics. Such moments humanize the abstract death toll—official counts around 6,000, independent estimates far higher.
Disconfirming the Alternative on Its Merits and Premise
The alternative narrative—peddled by defenders of the drug war—posits “nanlaban” as legitimate operational reality: suspects armed and aggressive, police acting in self-defense amid a narco-state threat. On its merits, this collapses under scrutiny. Forensic inconsistencies abound: planted evidence, multiple headshots at close range, victims often unarmed or in nightclothes. Leonen's opinion explicitly notes the narrative's selective absence in dela Rosa's case, exposing hypocrisy.
Philosophically, it fails Agamben's test: the state of exception cannot be normalized without eroding the rule of law. Premise-wise, it assumes a monolithic "drug menace" justifying mass extrajudiciality, ignoring socioeconomic drivers of addiction and the class bias—poor communities bear the brunt. Art disconfirms this by rendering the human cost: Gabuco's images show not hardened criminals but fathers, siblings, neighbors. Irony abounds—the “punisher's” lieutenant evades while claiming victimhood. This premise sustains impunity; art and Leonen's concurrence demand its dismantling. No credible evidence supports uniform "resistance" across thousands of cases; instead, patterns suggest policy-driven lethality.
Curatorial Narrative
In the exhibition proper, titled as above, visitors enter a liminal corridor lined with enlarged Lerma photographs—grieving figures frozen in eternal Pietà. The critique is implicit: where dela Rosa found sanctuary, these bodies found only finality. RESBAK installations critique the banality of evil (Arendt), with soundscapes of police radio chatter juxtaposed against widows' testimonies. Gabuco's couch becomes a relic, its bullet holes a Rorschach test for societal denial.
The narrative indicts stratified sovereignty. Dela Rosa, once issuing memoranda enabling operations, now at large post-ICC warrant, embodies the ironic reversal. Art workers like those in Kaisahan legacy understand this: protest aesthetics must name the exception. Humorous interventions—satirical cartoons of senators in bulletproof bubbles—lighten the weight while sharpening the sting. Poignantly, children's drawings from affected communities humanize the collateral.
Critically, this rejects aesthetic autonomy. As cultural gatekeeper, I assert art's duty: to unconceal (*aletheia*) the hidden metaphysics of power. The drug war's darkness persists in evasion; art offers spectral warrants, demanding accountability.
Expanded Summative Conclusion
The "nanlaban" that spared Bato while claiming multitudes reveals art's redemptive potential. From Kaisahan's solidarity to RESBAK's response, Philippine art enacts restitution—not through facile closure but dialectical confrontation. Esoterically, it haunts the republic's conscience, where elite evasion mocks subaltern sacrifice.
Philosophically, justice as recognition (Honneth) requires making the erased grievable. Anecdotally, curating these works transforms passive viewers into witnesses. Ironically, the fugitive senator's “non-resistance” becomes the ultimate exhibit label.
Only through such unflinching aesthetic labor can darker episodes yield to humane becoming. (Word count: ~1180 – condensed here for response; full expansion mirrors prior philosophical depth with added art anecdotes.)
**Footnotes** (embedded inline in full text; examples):
¹ Leonen, Separate Concurring Opinion, GR No. 278747.
² Guillermo, Alice G. *Social Realism in the Philippines*.
³ Gabuco, Carlo. Interview in *Photography and the Biopolitics of Fear*.
**References (Chicago Style)**
Leonen, Marvic MVF Separate Concurring Opinion. GR No. 278747. Supreme Court of the Philippines, 2026.
Guillermo, Alice G. *Social Realism in the Philippines*. Quezon City: Asphodel, 1980s editions referenced in later scholarship.
Rafael, Vicente L. “Photography and the Biopolitics of Fear.” *Positions* (2020).
Lerma, Raffy. Works documented in “Hudyat” exhibition, 2017.
RESBAK Collective. Various installations and performances, 2016–present.
Kaisahan Group. Manifesto, 1976. Archival references.
(Full bibliography would expand to 15+ entries based on cited works.)
This frame, narrative, and summation position art as both mirror and hammer—reflecting impunity while shattering its foundations. As a practitioner and gatekeeper, I invite confrontation with the spectral.
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™' s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility. The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
THE 1987 CONSTITUTIONTHE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINESPREAMBLEWe, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane society and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain and promulgate this Constitution.
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Cu2LaNimM/
Comments
Post a Comment